IRF2BP2 mutation with autoimmune enteropathy, immune deficiency, and respiratory failure

Case history: We present the case of a 31-year-old Hispanic male with history of recurrent bronchiectasis, invasive aspergillosis, and severe persistent asthma, who is now status post lung transplant for end-stage lung disease. He initially presented at 7 years of age with diarrhea, failure to thrive, and nearly absent immunoglobulin levels (IgG < 33 mg/dL, IgA < 7 mg/dL, IgM = 11 mg/dL, IgE = 4 IU/dL) necessitating IVIG treatment. Small intestinal biopsy showed villous atrophy consistent with autoimmune enteropathy. Sweat chloride was reported as indeterminate (44 me/dL). Initial WBC, platelet, and T- and NK-cell counts were within normal range, and B-cell count and percentage were borderline low. Most recently, he was found to have increased immature B-cell count (CD21low), decreased memory B-cells, and poor pneumococcal vaccine antibody response. Patient has been hospitalized numerous times with increasingly severe bronchiectasis, pneumonitis, and COVID-19 infections twice despite vaccination, leading to respiratory failure and lung transplantation. Family history is negative for immune deficiency and lung diseases. Discussion(s): Of these 3 VUSs (see the table), the one in IRF2BP2 has the most pathogenic potential due to its autosomal dominant inheritance, its location in a conserved domain (Ring), and previous case reports of pathogenic variants at the same or adjacent alleles 1-3. Baxter et al reported a de novo truncating mutation in IRF2BP2 at codon 536 (c.1606CinsTTT), which is similar to our patient's mutation. This patient was noted to have an IPEX-like presentation, with chronic diarrhea, hypogammaglobulinemia, and recurrent infections. Variant Functional Prediction Score for our variant predicts a potentially high damage effect. There are 2 other case reports of heterozygous mutations in loci adjacent to this allele;one (c.1652G>A)2 with a similar clinical phenotype to our patient and the other (C.625-665 del)3 with primarily inflammatory features and few infections. Impact: This case highlights a variant in IRF2BP2 associated with severe hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent pulmonary infections, and autoimmune enteropathy. [Table presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Retrospective Study on Vaccine Responses and Natural Course of COVID-19 Infections in Primary Immunodeficiency

We conducted a retrospective study in the adult primary immunodeficiency clinic at UAB examining COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 antibody response from vaccination, natural infection, and immunoglobulin replacement from February 2021 to November 2022. Our goal was to determine if nucleocapsid and spike antibodies could be found in our PID patients and if these antibodies could be derived from natural infection, vaccination, or antibody replacement exclusively or combinatory. We hypothesized that increasing antibodies would be detected in our population as the COVID period extended. Two hundred and forty-five subjects were tracked over 336 clinic visits during this period. Our PID population included subjects with CVID, XLA, thymoma, hypogammaglobulinemia, IgA deficiency, IgG subclass deficiency, specific antibody deficiency, Down syndrome, IgM deficiency, and patients with recurrent sinopulmonary infections. We had 196 females and 45 males in our study. In our patient population, 47% of our patient had known COVID-19 infection. Of those 47%, 21% of those infected patients had COVID-19 at least twice. Of those infected, three did not have COVID-19 spike antibodies and chose not to get vaccinated either. Two of those patients were not on IVIG and one was on Pangyza. Of those infected, 70% (n = 80) were on IgG infusions compared to those uninfected, 77% (n = 96) were on IgG infusions. Of interest, we had three XLA patients and all three had COVID-19 infection in the summer 2021. Two of them tested positive for nucleocapsid and spike antibodies in high titers and they were receiving Gammagard or Gamunex infusions, suggesting that these immunoglobulin preparations contain COVID-19 antibodies. We are still in the process of analyzing our data to see if diagnosis, IgG preparations, date of testing, B cell numbers, and drugs play a role in producing nucleocapsid antibodies and high spike antibody titers.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Immunoglobulin replacement products in current clinical use in the United States have poor neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strains

Background: Intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) Immunoglobulin G (IG) replacement products are in wide use in patients with primary antibody deficiency syndrome (PAD). There is limited data on the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies in IG products or their ability to neutralize emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. There is lack of data on the impact of IG therapy on serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike or neutralizing antibody titers in PAD patients. Method(s): We measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels and neutralizing titers against historical (WA1/2020) and variant (B.1.617.2 [Delta] and BA.1 [Omicron]) strains in 158 lots of 6 different IG products, collected between August 2021 to April 2022 and manufactured between December 2019 to December 2021. IG products were compared to serum from 20 healthy donors vaccinated with 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Serum anti-spike antibody level and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity were measured in 27 PAD patients treated with the tested IG products. Result(s): Anti-spike antibody titers started to increase in products manufactured in March 2021 and reached peak level, comparable to vaccinated healthy donors, in products manufactured in August 2021 (Fig. 1). The neutralization activity against WA1/2020 and Delta strains showed a similar pattern (Fig. 2). However, 95% of the tested products had no neutralization activity against Omicron. Until November 2021, IVIG products infused to patients in the study had anti-spike titers comparable to unvaccinated healthy donors (Fig. 3). Beginning in February 2022, IVIG products had anti-spike titers comparable to vaccinated healthy controls. Concurrent with a rise in anti-spike antibodies in IG products, PAD patients showed an increase in serum levels of anti-spike antibody and neutralizing activity against WA1/202 and Delta but not against Omicron variants. Testing of immunoglobulin replacement products neutralization activity against emerging variants BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 is underway.[Formula presented][Formula presented][Formula presented] Conclusion(s): The anti-SARS spike antibody and neutralization activity of IVIG products lags after the emergence of COVID-19 variants and currently have poor activity against Omicron strain. Because of the protracted manufacturing process, this is expected to be an ongoing challenge. As variants emerge, clinicians should consider additional means of protection for PAD patients such as vaccination, or prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Cellular immunity in COVID-19 and other infections in Common variable immunodeficiency.

COVID-19 has shed light on the role of cellular immunity in the absence of humoral response in different patient groups. Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is characterized by impaired humoral immunity but also an underlying T-cell dysregulation. The impact of T-cell dysregulation on cellular immunity in CVID is not clear, and this review summarizes available literature on cellular immunity in CVID with a particular focus on COVID-19. Overall mortality of COVID-19 in CVID is difficult to assess, but seems not significantly elevated, and risk factors for severe disease mirrors that of the general population, including lymphopenia. Most CVID patients have a significant T-cell response to COVID-19 disease with possible cross-reactivity to endemic coronaviruses. Several studies find a significant but impaired cellular response to basal COVID-19 mRNA vaccination that is independent of an antibody response. CVID patients with infection only have better cellular responses to vaccine in one study, but there is no clear association to T-cell dysregulation. Cellular response wane over time but responds to a third booster dose of vaccine. Opportunistic infection as a sign of impaired cellular immunity in CVID is rare but is related to the definition of the disease. CVID patients have a cellular response to influenza vaccine that in most studies is comparable to healthy controls, and annual vaccination against seasonal influenza should be recommended. More research is required to clarify the effect of vaccines in CVID with the most immediate issue being when to booster the COVID-19 vaccine.

Specific Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses to the Neoantigen RBD of SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with Primary and Secondary Immunodeficiency and Healthy Donors.

Patients with antibody deficiency disorders, such as primary immunodeficiency (PID) or secondary immunodeficiency (SID) to B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (B-CLPD), are two groups vulnerable to developing the severe or chronic form of coronavirus disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). The data on adaptive immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 are well described in healthy donors, but still limited in patients with antibody deficiency of a different cause. Herein, we analyzed spike-specific IFN-γ and anti-spike IgG antibody responses at 3 to 6 months after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 derived from vaccination and/or infection in two cohorts of immunodeficient patients (PID vs. SID) compared to healthy controls (HCs). Pre-vaccine anti-SARS-CoV-2 cellular responses before vaccine administration were measured in 10 PID patients. Baseline cellular responses were detectable in 4 out of 10 PID patients who had COVID-19 prior to vaccination, perceiving an increase in cellular responses after two-dose vaccination (p < 0.001). Adequate specific cellular responses were observed in 18 out of 20 (90%) PID patients, in 14 out of 20 (70%) SID patients and in 74 out of 81 (96%) HCs after vaccination (and natural infection in some cases). Specific IFN-γ response was significantly higher in HC with respect to PID (1908.5 mUI/mL vs. 1694.1 mUI/mL; p = 0.005). Whereas all SID and HC patients mounted a specific humoral immune response, only 80% of PID patients showed positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was significantly lower in SID compared with HC patients (p = 0.040), without significant differences between PID and HC patients (p = 0.123) and between PID and SID patients (p =0.683). High proportions of PID and SID patients showed adequate specific cellular responses to receptor binding domain (RBD) neoantigen, with a divergence between the two arms of the adaptive immune response in PID and SID patients. We also focused on the correlation of protection of positive SARS-CoV-2 cellular response to omicron exposure: 27 out of 81 (33.3%) HCs referred COVID-19 detected by PCR or antigen test, 24 with a mild course, 1 with moderate symptoms and the remaining 2 with bilateral pneumonia that were treated in an outpatient basis. Our results might support the relevance of these immunological studies to determine the correlation of protection with severe disease and for deciding the need for additional boosters on a personalized basis. Follow-up studies are required to evaluate the duration and variability in the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination or infection.

FUNCTIONALLY IMPAIRED ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO BNT162B2 BOOSTER VACCINATION IN CVID IgG RESPONDERS.

BACKGROUND: While previous studies described the production of IgG-antibodies in a subgroup of CVID-patients following mRNA-vaccinations with bnt162b2 SARS-CoV2 (CVID responders), the functionality of these antibodies in terms of avidity as measured by the dissociation rate constant (kdis) and the antibody response to booster immunization has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: In CVID responders and healthy individuals the avidity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum-antibodies and their neutralization capacity as measured by surrogate virus neutralizing antibodies were analyzed in addition to IgG-, IgM- and IgA-antibody levels and the response of circulating follicular T-helper cells after a third vaccination with BNT162b2 SARS-CoV2 mRNA-vaccine. METHODS: Binding IgG, IgA and IgM serum levels were analyzed by ELISA in CVID-patients responding to the primary vaccination (CVID responders, n=10) and healthy controls (n=41). The binding-avidity of anti-spike antibodies was investigated using biolayer interferometry in combination with biotin-labelled receptor-binding-domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV2 spike-protein and streptavidin-labelled sensors. Antigen-specific recall T-cell responses were assessed by measuring activation-induced markers by flow cytometry. RESULTS: After the third vaccination with BNT162b2 IgG-, IgM and IgA-antibody levels, sVNT levels and antibody avidity were lower in CVID responders as compared to healthy. In contrast αSpike-avidity was comparable in CVID responders and healthy individuals following primary vaccination. Follicular T-helper cell response to booster vaccination in CVID-responders was significantly reduced when compared to healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: Impaired affinity-maturation during booster-response provides new insight into CVID pathophysiology.

Immunoglobulin repertoire restriction characterizes the serological responses of patients with predominantly antibody deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Predominantly antibody deficiency (PAD) is the most common category of inborn errors of immunity and is underpinned by impaired generation of appropriate antibody diversity and quantity. In the clinic, responses are interrogated by assessment of vaccination responses, which is central to many PAD diagnoses. However, the composition of the generated antibody repertoire is concealed from traditional quantitative measures of serological responses. Leveraging modern mass spectrometry-based proteomics (MS-proteomics), it is possible to elaborate the molecular features of specific antibody repertoires, which may address current limitations of diagnostic vaccinology. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate serum antibody responses in patients with PAD following vaccination with a neo-antigen (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 vaccination) using MS-proteomics. METHODS: Following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 vaccination, serological responses in individuals with PAD and healthy controls (HCs) were assessed by anti-S1 subunit ELISA and neutralization assays. Purified anti-S1 subunit IgG and IgM was profiled by MS-proteomics for IGHV subfamily usage and somatic hypermutation analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients with PAD who were vaccine-responsive were recruited with 11 matched vaccinated HCs. Neutralization and end point anti-S1 titers were lower in PAD. All subjects with PAD demonstrated restricted anti-S1 IgG antibody repertoires, with usage of <5 IGHV subfamilies (median: 3; range 2-4), compared to ≥5 for the 11 HC subjects (P < .001). IGHV3-7 utilization was far less common in patients with PAD than in HCs (2 of 12 vs 10 of 11; P = .001). Amino acid substitutions due to somatic hypermutation per subfamily did not differ between groups. Anti-S1 IgM was present in 64% and 50% of HC and PAD cohorts, respectively, and did not differ significantly between HCs and patients with PAD. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the breadth of anti-S1 antibodies elicited by vaccination at the proteome level and identifies stereotypical restriction of IGHV utilization in the IgG repertoire in patients with PAD compared with HC subjects. Despite uniformly pauci-clonal antibody repertoires some patients with PAD generated potent serological responses, highlighting a possible limitation of traditional serological techniques. These findings suggest that IgG repertoire restriction is a key feature of antibody repertoires in PAD.

Impaired B Cell Recall Memory and Reduced Antibody Avidity but Robust T Cell Response in CVID Patients After COVID-19 Vaccination.

PURPOSE: Humoral and cellular immune responses were described after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID). This study aimed to investigate SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody quality and memory function of B cell immunity as well as T cell responses after COVID-19 vaccination in seroresponding and non-responding CVID patients. METHODS: We evaluated antibody avidity and applied a memory B cell ELSPOT assay for functional B cell recall memory response to SARS-CoV-2 after COVID-19 vaccination in CVID seroresponders. We comparatively analyzed SARS-CoV-2 spike reactive polyfunctional T cell response and reactive peripheral follicular T helper cells (pTFH) by flow cytometry in seroresponding and non-seroresponding CVID patients. All CVID patients had previously failed to mount a humoral response to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody avidity of seroresponding CVID patients was significantly lower than in healthy controls. Only 30% of seroresponding CVID patients showed a minimal memory B cell recall response in ELISPOT assay. One hundred percent of CVID seroresponders and 83% of non-seroresponders had a detectable polyfunctional T cell response. Induction of antigen-specific CD4+CD154+CD137+CXCR5+ pTFH cells by the COVID-19 vaccine was higher in CVID seroresponder than in non-seroresponder. Levels of pTFH did not correlate with antibody response or avidity. CONCLUSION: Reduced avidity and significantly impaired recall memory formation after COVID-19 vaccination in seroresponding CVID patients stress the importance of a more differentiated analysis of humoral immune response in CVID patients. Our observations challenge the clinical implications that follow the binary categorization into seroresponder and non-seroresponder.

A beacon in the dark: COVID-19 course in CVID patients from two European countries: Different approaches, similar outcomes.

Background: CVID patients present an increased risk of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection and re-infection and a higher COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. Since 2021, different therapeutic and prophylactic strategies have been employed in vulnerable groups (vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and antivirals). The impact of treatments over the last 2 years has not been explored in international studies considering the emergence of viral variants and different management between countries. Methods: A multicenter retrospective/prospective real-life study comparing the prevalence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection between a CVID cohort from four Italian Centers (IT-C) and one cohort from the Netherlands (NL-C), recruiting 773 patients. Results: 329 of 773 CVID patients were found positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 1st, 2020 and September 1st 2022. The proportion of CVID patients infected was comparable in both national sub-cohorts. During all waves, chronic lung disease, "complicated" phenotype, chronic immunosuppressive treatment and cardiovascular comorbidities impacted on hospitalization, whereas risk factors for mortality were older age, chronic lung disease, and bacterial superinfections. IT-C patients were significantly more often treated, both with antivirals and mAbs, than NL-C patients. Outpatient treatment, available only in Italy, started from the Delta wave. Despite this, no significant difference was found for COVID-19 severity between the two cohorts. However, pooling together specific SARS-CoV-2 outpatient treatments (mAbs and antivirals), we found a significant effect on the risk of hospitalization starting from Delta wave. Vaccination with ≥ 3 doses shortened RT-PCR positivity, with an additional effect only in patients receiving antivirals. Conclusions: The two sub-cohorts had similar COVID-19 outcomes despite different treatment approaches. This points out that specific treatment should now be reserved for selected subgroups of CVID patients, based on pre-existing conditions.

Case report: Clearance of longstanding, immune-deficiency-associated, vaccine-derived polio virus infection following remdesivir therapy for chronic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The global polio eradication campaign has had remarkable success in reducing wild-type poliovirus infection, largely built upon the live attenuated Sabin oral poliovirus vaccine. Whilst rare, vaccine poliovirus strains may cause infection and subsequently revert to a neurovirulent type, termed vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV). Persistent, vaccine derived infection may occur in an immunocompromised host (iVDPV), where it is a recognised complication following receipt of the Sabin vaccine. This has significant implications for the global polio eradication campaign and there is currently no agreed global strategy to manage such patients.Here we describe a case of a 50-year-old man with common variable immune deficiency, persistently infected with a neurovirulent vaccine-derived type 2 poliovirus following vaccination in childhood. iVDPV infection had proven resistant to multiple prior attempts at treatment with human breast milk, ribavirin and oral administration of a normal human pooled immunoglobulin product. His iVDPV infection subsequently resolved after 12 days treatment with remdesivir, an adenosine analogue prodrug that is an inhibitor of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, administered as treatment for a prolonged, moderate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. iVDPV from the patient, isolated prior to treatment, was subsequently demonstrated to be sensitive to remdesivir in vitro. Based on the observations made in this case, and the mechanistic rationale for use with iVDPV, there is strong justification for further clinical studies of remdesivir treatment as a potentially curative intervention in patients with iVDPV infection.

Safety of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity: an Italian Multicentric Study.

PURPOSE: Little is known about vaccine safety in inborn errors of immunity (IEI) patients during the current vaccination campaign for COVID-19. To better investigate the reactogenicity and adverse event profile after two, three, and four doses of mRNA vaccines, we conducted an observational, multicentric study on 342 PID patients from four Italian Referral Centres. METHODS: We conducted a survey on self-reported adverse reactions in IEI patients who received mRNA vaccine by administering a questionnaire after each dose. RESULTS: Over the whole study period, none of the patients needed hospitalization or had hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis and delayed injection site reaction. After two vaccination doses, 35.4% of patients showed only local reactogenicity-related symptoms (RrS), 44.4% reported both systemic and local RrS, and 5% reported only systemic RrS. In more than 60% of cases, local or systemic RrS were mild. After the first and second booster doses, patients showed fewer adverse events (AEs) than after the first vaccination course. Patients aged 50 years and older reported adverse events and RrS less frequently. Among AEs requiring treatment, one common variable immune deficiency patient affected by T cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia developed neutropenia and one patient had Bell's paralysis perhaps during herpes zoster reactivation. CONCLUSION: Although our follow-up period is relatively short, the safety data we reported are reassuring. This data would help to contrast the vaccine hesitancy often manifested by patients with IEI and to better inform their healthcare providers.

Safety and tolerability of Evusheld in patients with CVID: The Mayo Clinic experience.

Background: The past 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic brought with it many unknowns for patients with immunodeficiency. Because of the concern for severe infection in those with immunocompromise, patients have been eager for effective prevention, vaccination, and treatment strategies. Preexposure prophylaxis provides another means of prevention in those with immunocompromise. A combination of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld [AstraZeneca Cambridge, United Kingdom]) was granted emergency use authorization for preexposure prophylaxis at the end of 2021, but questions remained regarding how this would be tolerated and the side effects associated with its use. Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Evusheld in patients with CVID from our tri-site institution. Methods: We performed an institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review of patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) who received Evusheld before March 26, 2022. Results: Of the 45 patients with CVID who received Evusheld, 41 (91%) received the recommended full dose of 600 mg. The majority of patients (39 of 45 [87%]) tolerated Evusheld without adverse events. The adverse events reported included immediate injection site pain, fatigue and cough, an episode of shingles, and chest pain. Conclusions: This is an initial report on the safety and tolerability of Evusheld injections in patients with CVID. The majority of patients tolerated the injections without adverse events. For patients with reported chest pain, the results of a subsequent cardiac workup were negative. The efficacy of Evusheld could not be evaluated owing to the short median follow-up of this study (19 days).

SARS-COV-2 infections in inborn errors of immunity: A single center study.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a single-stranded RNA virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). One of the main topics of conversation in these past months in the world of immunology has been the issue of how patients with immune defects will fare if they contract this infection. To date there has been limited data on larger cohorts of patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) diagnosed with COVID-19. Here, we review the data of COVID-19 infections in a single center cohort of 113 patients from the Mount Sinai Immunodeficiency program, who had 132 infections between January 2020 and June 2022. This included 56 males and 57 females, age range 2 - 84 (median 42). The mortality rate was 3%. Comparison between admitted patients revealed a significantly increased risk of hospitalization amongst the unvaccinated patients, 4% vaccinated vs 40% unvaccinated; odds ratio 15.0 (95% CI 4.2 - 53.4; p <0.00001). Additionally, COVID anti-spike antibody levels, determined in 36 of these patients post vaccination and before infection, were highly variable.

Common variable immunodeficiency with granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease treated with monoclonal antibodies against COVID-19: A case report.

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most prevalent primary immunodeficiency. We present a 22-year-old Caucasian woman with CVID and granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease who contracted COVID-19 and was successfully treated with sotrovimab and molnupiravir. This treatment may have contributed to the relatively mild disease course of COVID-19 in our patient.

Case Report: Pneumonia in a Patient With Combined Variable Immunodeficiency: COVID-19 or Pneumocystis Pneumonia?

Combined variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency, characterized by impairment in immune system function. These patients are susceptible to opportunistic infections, which may mimic COVID-19 manifestations. Also, misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of opportunistic infections can lead to perilous consequences. We report a 28-year-old woman with a history of combined variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID) and ulcerative colitis (UC) complained of fever, cough, and dyspnea. According to the clinical and radiological manifestations and the COVID-19 epidemic, she was admitted with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. After a week, the patient did not respond to treatment, so she underwent bronchoscopy. Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology, we detected DNA of Pneumocystis jirovecii, the causative agent of a life-threatening pneumonia (PCP), in respiratory specimens. The patient was hypersensitive to common PCP treatments, so she was treated with high-dose clindamycin. However, the patient's clinical condition aggravated. Besides, we found evidence of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium in chest CT scan. We inserted a catheter for the patient to evacuate the air inside the mediastinum. Also, we added caspofungin to the treatment. The patient eventually recovered and was discharged from the hospital about a week later. Thus, during the COVID-19 epidemic, in febrile patients with respiratory symptoms, physicians should not think only of COVID-19. They must consider opportunistic infections such as PCP, especially in immunocompromised patients.

COVID-19 patients' clinical profile and outcome with respect to their vaccination status: A prospective observational multicentre cohort study during third wave in Western India.

PURPOSE: To understand the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination (Covishield, Covaxin) on clinical features and outcome of COVID-19 during the third wave in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary study aim was to describe the clinical profile and outcome of COVID-19 regarding their vaccination and to identify risk factors for disease progression in vaccinated patients. This was a prospective observational multicentric study of COVID-19 attended by Infectious Disease physicians during January 15, 2022 to February 15, 2022. Adult patients with positive RT-PCR or rapid antigen test for COVID-19 were enrolled. Patient received treatment as per local institutional protocol. Chi square test for categorical and Mann Whitney test for continuous variables were applied for the analysis. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 788 patients were included in analysis out of 883 enrolled patients from 13 centers across Gujarat. By the end of two weeks' follow up, 22 patients (2.8%) had expired. The Median age of subjects was 54 years, with a (55.8%) male. 90% of the subjects were vaccinated, majority (77%) of them had received 2 doses of vaccine with Covishield (659, 93%). Mortality among the non-vaccinated was significantly (11.4%) higher than vaccinated (1.8%). Logistic regression analysis showed numbers of comorbidities (p â€‹= â€‹0.027), baseline higher WBC count (p â€‹= â€‹0.02), higher NLR (p â€‹= â€‹0.016), and Ct value (p â€‹= â€‹0.046) were associated with mortality while vaccination was associated with survival (p â€‹= â€‹0.001). The factors associated with mortality among vaccinated were age, comorbidities, baseline higher WBC, NLR, and CRP. CONCLUSIONS: Omicron variant was associated with mild symptoms. Clinical and laboratory risk factors for getting severe disease with Omicron variant were the same with previous SARS CoV-2 strain. Two doses of vaccine protect people against severe disease and death. Age, comorbidities, baseline leucocytosis, high NLR, elevated CRP are the risk factors for poor outcome in vaccinated patients.

Antibody response following the third and fourth SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in individuals with common variable immunodeficiency.

Background: The antibody response after vaccination is impaired in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Objective: We aimed to study the spike receptor-binding domain IgG antibody (anti-S-RBD) levels during a four-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategy and after monoclonal antibody (mAB) treatment in CVID. Moreover, we assessed the anti-S-RBD levels in immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) products. Methods: In an observational study, we examined anti-S-RBD levels after the second, third, and fourth dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Moreover, we measured anti-S-RBD after treatment with mAB. Finally, anti-S-RBD was assessed in common IgRT products. Antibody non-responders (anti-S-RBD < 7.1) were compared by McNemar's test and anti-S-RBD levels were compared with paired and non-paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests as well as Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Among 33 individuals with CVID, anti-S-RBD levels increased after the third vaccine dose (165 BAU/ml [95% confidence interval: 85; 2280 BAU/ml], p = 0.006) and tended to increase after the fourth dose (193 BAU/ml, [-22; 569 BAU/ml], p = 0.080) compared to the previous dose. With increasing number of vaccinations, the proportion of patients who seroconverted (anti-S-RBD ≥ 7.1) increased non-significantly. mAB treatment resulted in a large increase in anti-S-RBD and a higher median level than gained after the fourth dose of vaccine (p = 0.009). IgRT products had varying concentrations of anti-S-RBD (p < 0.001), but none of the products seemed to affect the overall antibody levels (p = 0.460). Conclusion: Multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses in CVID seem to provide additional protection, as antibody levels increased after the third and fourth vaccine dose. However, anti-S-RBD levels from mAB outperform the levels mounted after vaccination. Clinical Implications: Boosting with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines seems to improve the antibody response in CVID patients. Capsule summary: The third and possibly also the fourth dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in CVID improve the antibody response as well as stimulate seroconversion in most non-responders.

Specific Antibody and the T-Cell Response Elicited by BNT162b2 Boosting After Two ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients have markedly decreased immune response to vaccinations. In this study we evaluated humoral and T cell-mediated responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-Cov-2) with additional flow cytometric changes in CVID patients receiving booster vaccination with BNT162b2 after two ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. The BNT162b2 vaccine raised the anti-spike protein S immunoglobulin G over the cut-off value from 70% to 83% in CVID, anti-neutralizing antibody had been raised over a cut-off value from 70% to 80% but levels after boosting were significantly less in both tests than in healthy controls (*p=0.02; **p=0.009 respectively). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin A became less positive in CVID after boosting, but the difference was not significant. The cumulative interferon-γ positive T cell response by ELISpot was over the cut-off value in 53% of the tested individuals and raised to 83% after boosting. This and flow cytometric control of cumulative CD4+ and CD8+ virus-specific T cell absolute counts in CVID were also statistically not different from healthy individuals after boosting. Additional flow cytometric measures for CD45+ lymphocytes, CD3+, and CD19+ cells have not shown significant differences from controls except for lower CD4+T cell counts at both time points (**p=0.003; **p=0.002), in parallel CD4+ virus-specific T-cell ratio was significantly lower in CVID patients at the first time point (*p: 0.03). After boosting, in more than 33% of both CVID patients and also in their healthy controls we detected a decrease in absolute CD45+, CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+, CD19+, and CD16+56+ cell counts. CD16+CD56+ cell counts were significantly lower compared to controls before and after boosting (*p=0.02, *p=0.02). CVID patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy throughout the previous year or autologous stem cell transplantation two years before vaccination had worse responses in anti-spike, anti-neutralizing antibody, CD3+CD4+T, CD19+ B, and natural killer cell counts than the whole CVID group. Vaccinations had few side effects. Based on these data, CVID patients receiving booster vaccination with BNT162b2 after two ChadOx1 can effectively elevate the levels of protection against COVID-19 infection, but the duration of the immune response together with COVID-19 morbidity data needs further investigation among these patients.

Monoclonal antibody treatment of COVID-19 in a pregnant woman with common variable immunodeficiency.

BACKGROUND: Since the first reported case of COVID-19, infections due to the virus have ranged from mild to severe. Patients with inborn errors of immunity are thought to be at increased risk for infections such as COVID-19 due to the nature of their disease and being immunocompromised. Similarly, pregnant women by nature of physiological changes in immunity are susceptible to infections and consequently are felt to be at greater risk of contracting COVID-19 with potential grave consequences for not only the mother but also the fetus. Early treatment with novel therapeutics against the SARS-CoV-2 virus to prevent progression and these complications is paramount. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old woman with a 22-year history of common variable immunodeficiency on subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy and 24 weeks pregnant with her third child presented to the Emergency Department with two-day history of pharyngitis that progressed to include nasal and chest congestion, non-productive cough and shortness of breath. Her vitals indicated temperature of 35 degrees Celsius, heart rate of 109 beats per minute, blood pressure 142/92 mmHg, respiratory rate 22/min and an oxygen saturation of 99% on room air. A workup was done and she was found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus confirmed by PCR. She had a close contact, her husband, who had tested positive a few days prior. She had been previously vaccinated with three doses of the Moderna COVID-19 (Spikevax ®) vaccine. As she met the criteria for monoclonal antibody treatment, she received Sotrovimab on the same day of testing positive and tolerated it well with no side-effects. Her symptoms resolved within two to three days. CONCLUSION: Our case, is the first to our knowledge, of a pregnant patient with common variable immunodeficiency diagnosed with COVID-19 and symptomatic successfully receiving treatment with Sotrovimab. Her rapid resolution of symptoms makes the use of monoclonal antibodies such as Sotrovimab a safe and useful option in this unique population.

Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with common variable immunodeficiency and a matched control group: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

The risk of severe adult respiratory coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the course of the infection among individuals with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) relative to the general population have been a matter of debate. We conducted a Danish nationwide study comparing the timing of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, the risk of first confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, re-infection, and the outcome of infection among individuals with CVID relative to an age- and gender matched control group. Cox regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios. The CVID patients received SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations earlier than those included in the population control group. Even so, the risks of both first infection and re-infection were increased among the individuals with CVID. The CVID group also had increased risk for hospital contacts due to SARS-CoV-2 infection relative to the general population. However, reassuringly, the risk of mechanical ventilation and death did not differ between the groups, but the numbers were low in both groups, making the estimates uncertain. Though this is the largest study to investigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections and outcomes hereof among individuals with CVID relative to the general population, we cannot rule out minor differences in severity, which might only be detectable with an even larger sample size.